MovieGeek: Take away my bluescreen!
I recall sitting in the venerable Senator Theater in Baltimore on a summer evening in 1991. I was at the movies by myself, because none of my friends wanted to go see some horror-sf sequel called TERMINATOR 2.
But I was enthralled, for a dozen reasons. But one of the most compelling was this new technology they showed us. I ran home afterward and told the Film Professor that he absolutely needed to see this movie - even if it wasn't an exciting story with good acting and a kick-butt heroine unlike any I'd ever seen, it had this neat... morphing thing! Like they were using computers to draw, only making it look real!
T2 was really the nascent birth of CGI, and immediately Hollywood fell in love with it. It's hard to imagine a movie now that doesn't have some kind of computerized effect, whether it's removing Gary Sinese's legs in FORREST GUMP or creating the walking trees of LORD OF THE RINGS. It's allowed us to do movies that never could have been done outside of animation.
And sometimes, it stinks.
Look, I love that we're able to make Aslan speak and Iron Man fly. But sometimes I think we've lost something in this world of Industrial Light and Magic. It's an odd thing to say on the eve of the summer blockbuster season, I know.
When Christopher Reeve donned the red cape in the first SUPERMAN, it may have been a royal pain to spend endless days in a flying harness. But compare those wonderful effects with poor Brandon Routh, who turned into CGI when his boots left the ground. Yes, he could do more interesting things. Yes, he could hover in a Christlike pose soaking in the sun to heal himself. But it just wasn't as real.
And hey, I absolutely loved watching Yoda's two-foot self in a lightsaber battle with Christopher Lee. But somehow the CGI Yoda failed to capture the character the way Jim Henson's puppet did. The puppet can't fight a battle, but it could emote in a way computers simply cannot.
I was thinking about this because we picked up the Indiana Jones Adventure Set. It's remedial viewing, as CultureGeek Jr. needs to be properly prepared for next week's premiere. I covered his eyes during the melting face from RAIDERS, but after he went to bed, I watched the special feature about it.
Turns out they built a fake skull, then layered it with gelatin in various shades of red, veined with blue yarn, and coated with flesh-colored gelatin. Then they used propane heaters to make it melt. It was soft gelatin, but it still took about ten minutes to melt. Then they sped it up to 240 times the speed for the brief shot that made RAIDERS into a horror movie.
The special effects man, explaining how he did this, said if they were to make RAIDERS today, he'd still do it the same way, but clean it up a bit with computers - he can see flaws he'd like to correct. (Nobody tell Lucas - they already removed the obvious pane of glass between Harrison Ford and the asp in the Well of Souls.)
But if they were making RAIDERS today, they wouldn't waste time melting gelatin with propane lamps. A melting face is nothing to the megacomputers of ILM, right? Somehow, though, I just don't think it would have the same impact. There's a reality to a practical effect that we lose in CGI.
As we were watching the movie, I explained to CultureGeek Jr. that the under-the-truck stunt was a real guy. It wasn't a computerized guy - it was a real stuntman doing that. His eyes widened, and he watched the scene with new respect. He's used to the cheat, you see. Nothing impresses him when it's only pixels at risk.
I have no doubt that the summer lineup will give us a visual array to make even the Wachowski Brothers blink twice. The CGI geniuses will put forth their best art for us, and I do appreciate the skill it takes to do this job well.
But sometimes, I wish they'd just melt some Jell-O and see what happens.

